Guys, we found this product first. One of our writers spent three hours every day for two weeks looking for an Ipod Nano video clone. Thegadgetsite just slapped a watermark from an already watermarked product photo, and we found that photo. It wasn't even on alibaba. Just FYI. A big boo to the gadgetsite. Our link below. Hope Paul does the right thing. If he doesn't, no big deal, engadget has been really good to us. Probably not Paul's fault too. I mean, that watermark from thegadgetsite really does look juicy.
If they found it on their own but only later than us, Endgaget won't hear a squeak from me, but they'd never had without us. We had to go through pages of products to find it. You think we could just search "iPhone clone" and found the thing? It took days of backbreaking surfing. That's why I'm gritting my teeth. grrr.
I don't know who you are, but you shouldn't be questioning others' integrity like that.
From the insults and threats you've left on our site, I've actually found one interesting detail: you primary goal seems to get "links" from Engadget. That may explain the low quality website/writing that I witnessed just minutes ago.
Please consider a public apology to us. If you're too ashamed, one via email will suffice.
I'm talking about ethics. This particular post was made from two weeks of dedicatedly searching wholesalers sites. I suppose your primary goal in watermarking a product photo that already has a watermark is not to get links?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BrianB @ Sep 23rd 2007 11:38PM
Guys, we found this product first. One of our writers spent three hours every day for two weeks looking for an Ipod Nano video clone. Thegadgetsite just slapped a watermark from an already watermarked product photo, and we found that photo. It wasn't even on alibaba. Just FYI. A big boo to the gadgetsite. Our link below. Hope Paul does the right thing. If he doesn't, no big deal, engadget has been really good to us. Probably not Paul's fault too. I mean, that watermark from thegadgetsite really does look juicy.
http://www.pmptoday.com/2007/09/22/ipod-nano-video-clone-officially-available/
Thomas @ Sep 24th 2007 12:36AM
@BrianB --- that is what i thought... you all sure did find this first... EnGadget Was late as was Da Gadget Store... lol.. www.PMPToday.com rules...
Thomas
www.ChinaGrabber.com
BrianB @ Sep 24th 2007 12:51AM
If they found it on their own but only later than us, Endgaget won't hear a squeak from me, but they'd never had without us. We had to go through pages of products to find it. You think we could just search "iPhone clone" and found the thing? It took days of backbreaking surfing. That's why I'm gritting my teeth. grrr.
AnimeNinja @ Sep 24th 2007 1:37AM
Carebear of the year award nomination received.
theretreat @ Sep 24th 2007 3:02AM
I don't know who you are, but you shouldn't be questioning others' integrity like that.
From the insults and threats you've left on our site, I've actually found one interesting detail: you primary goal seems to get "links" from Engadget. That may explain the low quality website/writing that I witnessed just minutes ago.
Please consider a public apology to us. If you're too ashamed, one via email will suffice.
BrianB @ Sep 24th 2007 12:51PM
I'm talking about ethics. This particular post was made from two weeks of dedicatedly searching wholesalers sites. I suppose your primary goal in watermarking a product photo that already has a watermark is not to get links?
BrianB @ Sep 24th 2007 12:53PM
I never threatened you, just told you a universal fact believed by all Buddhists: every one, yes even you, get their just deserts.